ImagingInfo.com |

Magazine Article

  


Facial Retouching - How Much Is Too Much?
Know how to gauge when you've gone too far


These three photographs show a comparison of no retouching (top), too much retouching (middle), and just enough retouching (bottom). You want to reduce the lines around the eyes without losing the detail in the eyes.
© Gary & Jerry Small


The original photo (at top) without any retouching, and the final image (above). Notice that along with the facial retouching, the corners have been darkened in the final image for dramatic effect.
© Gary & Jerry Small


© Gary & Jerry Small


The before (at top) image and after (above). Notice the retouching that was done includes smoothing out the model's skin as well as taming flyaway hairs; in addition to burning down the corners.
© Gary & Jerry Small



Now there's a question that's long been the subject of so many interpretations-how could we possibly have a definitive answer? The short answer is: There really is no right answer. The reason? Retouching, like many forms of art, is subject to interpretation. Interpretation by who? Usually the person paying the bill! Or, as many experts have said over and over, "beauty is in the eye of the checkbook holder."

That being said, for those of us doing retouching, we need guidelines to go by to help keep us from going too far. A late mentor of mine, referring to traditional retouching, often said, "Retouching should be invisible, to the point that anyone looking at the finished image can't tell it was retouched." That was the best piece of advice I ever received, and I've been guided by that mantra for all the years I've been doing retouching, whether traditional or digital.

Adobe Photoshop is such a wonderfully diverse program. It allows us to do anything we want to an image. But as I've often argued, just because we can do something doesn't mean we should. Just like photography, there are so many ways of achieving the same end result with Photoshop; no one can claim that their way is the right way, or the definitive way, of doing something. That includes me. I've been teaching Photoshop for the last eight years, and over that time I've seen many examples of what I feel is overdone retouching. Since this is an entirely subjective interpretation, I'm going to center on my own opinion of what is "too much" when it comes to facial retouching.

The most common examples I've seen of overdoing it are: over-softening faces, over-retouching under the eyes, completely removing every line and wrinkle, over-whitening the whites of the eyes, and completely removing any highlights and shadows so as to totally remove any lighting created by the photographer.

Facial softening: Thanks to digital, many photographers no longer use soft-focus filters when shooting portraits. Instead, they apply the softening later. There are many ways of softening, including a ton of third-party filters. In most cases, I brush on the softening effect to avoid softening things like eyes, lips, hair, and teeth, which shouldn't be softened. Most softening effects involve some kind of blurring, like using Photoshop's Gaussian Blur filter, to a certain degree. And while a little softening is nice, totally removing all traces of skin texture is, in my opinion, a big no-no.

Under-eye retouching: Everybody has something going on under their eyes-dark circles, wrinkles, puffiness, or all of the above. And while I don't know anyone who doesn't appreciate having that area improved, overdoing it is just not realistic-especially as subjects age. This kind of finesse comes from experience, but as a guideline, I generally remove less from under the eyes as the subjects get older. As a mentor of mine put it, "Grandparents earned those wrinkles. Who are we to take them away?"

Wrinkles: This is the same as the guidelines for under-eye retouching. Again, while many people don't like getting hit with a dose of reality when they look at themselves, totally removing every line and wrinkle is unrealistic. It still has to look like them, albeit a much improved version. As they age, I find myself removing fewer wrinkles and lines. How many senior citizens do you see with absolutely no lines or winkles?

Whites of the eyes: As my now-teenage daughter text messages so often, "OMG!" (That's text-speak for "Oh My Goodness!") If there's any one thing that's been overdone more than anything else, it's the whites of the eyes. Folks, let me give you a tip: The whites of the eyes aren't really white! That's just an expression. If you look closely at eyes, they're really off-white. Use Photoshop's Eyedropper tool, along with the Info palette, and roll over the white of an eye. The red, green, and blue values in the Info palette won't be the same. We also have blood vessels running through our eyes, and while we do want to help our subjects so they don't look bloodshot, totally bleaching them out so they have no texture or definition is, in my humble opinion, more unrealistic than over-softening a face.

Highlight/shadow removal: Nobody likes an overly shiny face-it makes people look sweaty and greasy and is unflattering. At the other extreme, bad lighting can sometimes cause undesirable shadows that we'd like to see improved. However, completely removing the shiny highlights and all shadows flattens a face out so much that the face loses dimensionality and, once again, begins to take on a cartoonlike appearance. Like every other aspect of retouching, this requires a certain amount of finesse. Remove just enough so it doesn't look bad but still looks realistic. In the case of shadows, sometimes we do need to totally remove a bad shadow, especially if the purpose is to fix bad lighting. But don't go so far as to remove natural shadowing that helps shape a face and give it dimension.

Communication is Tool #1

Perhaps the most important tip I can offer is about communication. As with many retouchers, early in my career I made the very mistakes I outlined earlier. In some cases, I learned the hard way by being forced to redo or remove retouching and make new prints. In many of these cases, I was very pleased with the work I did on someone's face and couldn't wait to show off to the customer, only to be met with rejection and disappointment over doing too much. I learned the best way to avoid remakes and wasting valuable time and resources is to talk to customers at the time the orders are taken; ask them how much retouching they want. I have a collection of before-and-after images, with different levels of retouching. The customer signs off on everything-there's no doubt as to expectations.

The most important thing to learn from this is you will find from talking to your customers that there are people who want little to no retouching. On the other end of the spectrum, you'll have the occasional customer who wants every line and wrinkle removed and every trick in your retouching book done-or as I call it, "digital plastic surgery." I once had a customer whose face was prematurely wrinkled tell me she wanted me to fully retouch the image of her so she didn't see one line or wrinkle whatsoever. When I got done, it looked like a different person. She looked 25 years younger and, to tell you the truth, I wasn't thrilled with doing that extreme of a job. But she absolutely loved it. Go figure! That was an extreme case, however, and far from the norm. If I didn't have a conversation with her, though, I wouldn't have known to retouch to that extent.

In my classes, I pair up two photographers and have them exchange photos of themselves, so they each have one of themselves and one of his or her buddy. Both photos are then retouched by both photographers and then compared. The picture each student has retouched of himself or herself usually comes out perfectly, while the one of his or her buddy is overdone in some way (according to them). There are usually similar results from the buddy's point of view. Why? Because we know how we like to see ourselves and won't go too far. Yet we try to do everything we know to our buddy's picture to show them our abilities. Try this test, and use the retouching you do on your own picture as a guideline for others-you'll be in the ballpark 99% of the time.

In most cases, people want to see improvement yet still look like themselves. Of course, remove any blemishes, cuts, flyaway hair, scars, etc. And flatter the subject with a little softening of the skin, smoothing out under the eyes, and removing some wrinkles (but not all). But please be careful and try not to go too far, even though the temptation is great.

[Editor's Note: Along with retouching techniques you can learn, and software plug-ins like Image Trends' PearlyWhites and ShineOff, and Imagenomic's Portraiture, there are also companies who can perform retouching services for you, such as CanvasArtworks.com, DigitalCustom, Hollywood FotoFix, JaincoTech, Onlinephotofix.com, PicWash, and others.]

Gary Small of Photographic Creations (www.jsmallphoto.com) has been a pro since 1979 and in business with his father, Jerry, for most of that time. He instructs other photographers in Photoshop and color management and is teaching at the L.I. Photo Workshop this August 4 - 7, 2008. For more information on the L.I. Photo Workshop, check out the website at (www.liphotoworkshop.com).


   


Visitor Comments
Sort by Post: Most RecentFirst Comment

Posted by Bob Schroeder in Ewing, NJ
Excessive retouching
Gary Smalls article should be read by the art department at PLAYBOY magazine and most of the fashion magazines. Hes absolutely correct. A lot of the "fixing" Ive seen looks amateurish. The fact that so much retouching is done in commercial print is a sad reflection on how jaded our society has become toward accepting anyone who looks less than perfect.
#
(07/22/08 - 12:50 PM)


Posted by Barry Hertzberg in Newtown, PA
Solid methodology & practice
Oh Ricky!!!!! You are wrong. Sorry buddy, but you and your British couterpart are missing the point that this is a very solid article about basic methodology and how to spot when you are being a tad overzealous with your application of technique.

Garys method described in the article is a basic method. Its not as refined as you might personally like it - but it gets you there and in fact, its pretty much the basic method used and taught by Kelby, Kost, and Ames to name a few of the greats who teach PS. There is nothing wrong here.

Are you aware that you are basing your opinion on a print in a magazine? It has certain limitations. The images you are looking at are crafted form trade print - not photographic prints. Big difference. Allowing for that and understanding that you have to be a bit more rendered to illustrate the point on a photo in a trade magazine, you can certainly understand that Gary is presenting well here.

I do have to question your experience and disposition. You have not left the reader a hint of your name and your experience. I think you are doing us all a disservice by commenting poorly and generating a negative tone in the industry. We are here to learn, not to criticize.

Although my site is a bit dated and Im working on retooling it - my client work speaks for itself. I have had numerous clients who have purchased my work and made my studio a respected name in my locale. My methods are similar to Garys and we believe in the KISS methodologies applied whenever possible. It makes sense to not get so tied up in PS. There are always multiple ways to accomplish what you need to get done in PS. That is what makes it a versatile tool.

I humbly suggest that you apologize, present your credentials, and explain how you approach things. See - if you present a solution - you belong here. If you present nothing but blind criticism or praise - you are not really doing much but exposing yourself as ignorant, or at best limited. Do more for yourself and contribute seriously.

My name is Barry Hertzberg and my work can be found at:
http://youlivethemoment.com

We use various retouching techniques and keep every book Scott Kelby writes at arms length. We also use Imagenomics Portraiture to put the finishing touches on a lot of our portrait for album work.

Thank you,

Barry
(07/22/08 - 11:38 AM)


Posted by Joanne Orshan in Roslyn, NY
Photoshop Retouching
I have personally been trained by Gary Small to learn retouching techniques using Photoshop CS3. Not only has Garys knowledge and insight been invaluable to my photography business, Mr. Small is the most informative person I have yet to meet in regards to photoshop usage and application. He is an exceptional teacher. His patience and diligence with his students goes beyond what is expected by most.
As professionals in this industry it would serve most of us better to be constructive than rip apart each other. It is unclear as to what Mr. Estebans profession is, what is clear is that he needs to express himself with more eloquence and respect for those of us who are trying our hardest to make a living at photography. Most photographers I meet do not spend the time or effort to make sure that each image they reproduce is of high quality. Gary Small is a master at this. He has been my mentor and I respect him for his dedication and desire to help those of us with less experience to be the best we can.
In my opinion, $650.00 for his seminar is a bargain.
(07/18/08 - 04:34 PM)


Posted by Eddie Tapp
Just make me look great!!!!
Hi Gary... It has become difficult to find a good foundation for retouching info that youve provided here... I happen to like your thinking process as to why you do things a certain way... Experience being the best teacher... and learning something new is the fun part of learning... youve covered the right issues here for those of us wanting to learn a more professional approach to facial retouching... Thank you...
(07/15/08 - 10:48 AM)


Posted by Diane Berkenfeld, editor in Melville, NY
Comment Submissions
After reading the posts that have been submitted regarding this article and a great deal of thought - imaginginfo.com is instituting a new rule for the posting of comments to articles.
If you are going to post a negative comment in reaction to a press release or article that you have read on our site, we request that you include your name and website (if you are a professional photographer or retailer and have one).
Whether commenting on an article, or discussing issues in a forum, unless you are willing to have your fellow readers/visitors be able to view/critique your own work - negative postings will be discouraged. It is easy to criticize others when you are hiding behind a veil of anonymity.
(07/14/08 - 02:55 PM)


Posted by Diane Berkenfeld, editor in Melville, NY
Retouching examples
As the editor of Studio Photography, I would like to step in here and remind everyone viewing this article and the examples that in the first example showing the same portion of a photograph three times - the first version is un-retouched; and the second version is meant to be an example of bad retouching - what not to do. The bottom version is the one showing a good amount of retouching where wrinkles are gone. It reminds me of the look of a portrait shot with a soft focus filter (remember using them when shooting with film?)
(07/14/08 - 08:49 AM)


Posted by AA in London, UK
Mr Esteban is right
Id love to see hi-res of those images because even the low-res retouching looks extremely bad, the retouched images just looks like skin has been blurred and the third not much better with a little masking and looks extremely flat?

Sure retouching is subjective, and some people have badly calibrated monitors.

You technique using gaussian blur to smooth out skin is amateurish at best and a dead giveaway that you dont really know how to use photoshop or retouch.

Mr Small why dont you post a link to the hi-res retouched and original images to prove Mr Esteban and I wrong!

AA
(07/12/08 - 01:54 PM)


Posted by rwspangler in Springfiled, VA
Retouching
While the article might have a few good points, the photo examples used are at best, not what I would give to clients. I would not consider this a good article on retouching. The methods and results are (to quote Mr. Esteban) crude.

This article has actually diminished the status and reputation of your publication in my mind.
(07/12/08 - 08:11 AM)


Posted by A. Dirk Dabel in Boise ID.
Photoshop retouch
Gary Small is right on the money here. I would have to agree that many newbies overdue it in regard to softening, and teeth and eyes over whitening. I would have to disagree with Mr Estebans harsh and critical assesment of Mr Smalls work. I find the retouching quite pleasing and in line with the wishes of my aging and younger clients as well.
Best Wishes!
Dirk Dabel
www.Lightdances.com
Boise ID.
(07/11/08 - 06:47 PM)


Posted by Gary Small in Bellmore, NY
Response to Mr. Esteban
If you recall, way, way up at the beginning of the article, I pointed out that retouching and the perception of such is highly subjective. Put another way, its like the old saying, "one mans medicine is another mans poison". And while we are all entitled to our opinions (after all, thats what makes the world go round), referring to the images as appalling is a bit extreme.

I would like very much for you to elaborate on which points are debatable, as again, these are my opinions of what to keep in mind when retouching an image. They have guided me in my work for over 12 years with great success.

As far as the images presented in this article, Ive always found it difficult to evaluate images the way they appear in magazines for a couple of reasons. First, the online versions are extremely downsized and therefore lose detail in the process. If you saw the full sized images, you would see the detail and quality the customers loved so much. Second, since everybodys monitor displays images differently, I cant possibly know what youre looking at.

As to the retouching in the examples, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but I think Obvious and Crude is going a little too far. The first image was the result of the communication I referred to in the article. The customer WANTED a complete makeover, with all lines and defects removed. Believe me, she absolutely loved the results. And of course the skin texture isnt going to match. Thats the whole idea! It needed to be smoothed out. As for tone, other than softening, tone was not changed, so I dont know why you mentioned that.

In all 3 cases, the clients wanted the level of retouching shown (again, communication with the clients is key). And again, the full sized images show the quality of the retouching. The young lady in the bottom image wanted her face smoothed out and thinned out and I accomplished that for her. It looks anything but crude.

As for the class at the Long Island Photo Workshop, the fee is anything but princely. I dont think you are aware that this is a 4 day class, which covers much more than facial retouching. It also includes topics in Photoshop Lightroom, color management, workflow, advanced Photoshop techniques, and effective presentation using Photodexs Proshow Producer. And the $650 includes 4 days of instruction, lunch every day, a wonderful graduation banquet, t-shirt, class photo, week long trade show with top vendors, and 2 merits for PPA members. Princely? I dont think so. More like great value. And I can show you the testimonials from all of my students over the last 5 years. Nobody walked out disappointed.

I would invite you to spend the week with me in my class and would welcome your opinions. I think you may walk out with a different point of view.

Thank you for your thoughts.
(07/11/08 - 11:33 AM)


Posted by Ricardo Esteban in Los Angeles, CA
Retouching 101
The author makes numerous debatable points in this article but regardless of what one might think of the content, the before and after images are, frankly, appalling.

Particularly egregious is the first image. In the retouched version, skin tone and texture bear no resemblance to the original. In all three examples, the retouching is obvious and crude.

I also see where Mr. Small is offering a seminar for the princely sum of $650. I think Ill pass.

(07/11/08 - 12:36 AM)



Submit a Comment

 
Name: *
Subject:
City, State:
 
 
   
 
For verifcation purposes, please enter the characters you see in the image below
 
 
   
 
   
* = required
(comments will appear after this article, as well as on our Visitors Respond Page)






PTN Dailes HERE