Digicams Can, Part 5:
This in Not Your Father's Digicam
By Don Sutherland
December 2001
Are digicams developing quickly, or
what? Look at it this way. This is Part 5 in a monthly series. And
some camera features under discussion today were not on the market
at the time of our Part 1. That's what you call quick.
The feature that didn't exist for Part 1 was the fully usable
electronic viewfinder in digital still cameras. EVFs go back more
than five months, of course, but reluctantly, I've had to issue
caveats about limitations they impose. Their general graininess,
combined with their unique and private interpretations of the
colors and contrasts in a scene, should be enough to discourage
some users. It's not what most people expect from still cameras.
Those with video camcorder experience will find these conditions
easier to accept.
But about those who take pictures in the dark?
How dark is dark?
It might be safe to say that most of the picture-taking masses are
not the low-light junkies I am, and would not undertake the extra
steps a working photojournalist does for after-dark photography.
But it's equally safe to say that most of the masses are likely to
try taking pictures in restaurants, livingrooms, railroad stations
and the like, where lighting's not quite bright as day. What does
an EVF show 'em?
In normal room lighting, some of the EVFs I've used could show
outlines and silhouettes of my photographic subjects. But details
of their faces? Not easy to see. The on-camera flash delivers
enough light to photograph folks' expressions. But just what they
looked like, whether both eyes were open, say, is something you
never noticed.
And if Joe Foto decides to go camping, and Jane wants to take some
nocturnal snapshots, how's she supposed to know if Joe's in the
frame at all? The flash might make a fine exposure, but the shot
might include no more than Joe's earlobe. It's no easy trick,
shooting without a viewfinder.
So while otherwise wonderful cameras from some of the majors
— Canon, Fujifilm, Olympus, Sony — expanded the
snapshooter's range with things like high-performance zoom lenses,
they tooketh away again by blinding the camera after dark.
Some snapshooters simply won't care. If they live in Arizona and go
to bed at eight, they might not have call for shooting in the
dark.
But maybe some customers should be steered toward an
optical-viewfinder camera. Better to find out on the front end,
before the customer returns all huffing and puffing.
Can nothing be said in favor of the EVF? Well, it does suck-up less
power than the fullsize monitor on most digicams. If customers take
to using 'em for menu settings and in-camera picture review, they
leave that much more battery juice intact. Then again, though an
EVF needs but little juice, in normal shooting it's still more than
any optical viewfinder requires.
The condition was not fatal five months ago, but it needed
addressing. How fast do digicams develop? Five months later, the
worst of the problem's getting solved.
Beyond human eyesight?
Minolta was the next to join the EVF bandwagon, saying something
about a light-amplifying EVF, but couldn't most EVFs be turned-up
already? Even Minolta seemed unsure of how much improvement to
expect.
I found out the hard way. On a shoot that started at midnight. Five
midnights in a row. In a ship's drydock. Where such lights as there
were needed to point where the sandblasters blasted. Where a
giant-size hull blocked my share of their light. Where the 40-foot
walls of the drydock blocked any light from outside. Where there
were hoses and ropes and beams and blocks and poles and holes all
over the floor.
Whatta place to be stuck with an EVF.
So imagine my surprise, as I stumbled and lurched toward the bow,
to see in the EVF a bunch of details that my own eye did not.
|




