http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2008/05/02/defining-the-line-for-portrait-photographers-whats-art-and-whats-not/ Blog for eye-opening perspectives on photography Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:43:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2008/05/02/defining-the-line-for-portrait-photographers-whats-art-and-whats-not/#comment-2949 Michael Timmons Wed, 14 May 2008 16:08:38 +0000 http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2008/05/02/defining-the-line-for-portrait-photographers-whats-art-and-whats-not/#comment-2949 The concept of "art' is completely subjective. Annie Leibovitz has always inspired me. Personally, I found nothing wrong with the image. Today, the media loves to create forced controversy. Take a stroll through any museum displaying classic portraiture photography through out the years, and you'll most likely see images similar in nature. The concept of “art’ is completely subjective. Annie Leibovitz has always inspired me. Personally, I found nothing wrong with the image. Today, the media loves to create forced controversy. Take a stroll through any museum displaying classic portraiture photography through out the years, and you’ll most likely see images similar in nature.

]]> http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2008/05/02/defining-the-line-for-portrait-photographers-whats-art-and-whats-not/#comment-2819 Mark Wed, 07 May 2008 21:39:57 +0000 http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2008/05/02/defining-the-line-for-portrait-photographers-whats-art-and-whats-not/#comment-2819 You should be on "Dancing with the Stars" The tile of the article had nothing to do with the content, even worse, any reference to art was cowardly avoided. The article should have been called, "Let's Rehash Another Overblown Story" You should be on “Dancing with the Stars” The tile of the article had nothing to do with the content, even worse, any reference to art was cowardly avoided. The article should have been called, “Let’s Rehash Another Overblown Story”

]]>