<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;Drama&#8221; Queen</title>
	<link>http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2007/07/16/the-drama-queen/</link>
	<description>Blog for eye-opening perspectives on photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: S. Broadley</title>
		<link>http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2007/07/16/the-drama-queen/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Broadley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imaginginfo.com/interactive/2007/07/16/the-drama-queen/#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>.....I suppose we have all seen the released video of that now "infamous" photo shoot. It appeared to me that the Queen was only trying to say that the crown took a fair bit of work to put on her head (and get the hair just right) and that they should take the "crown" photos first and then the "crown off" photos afterwards. And I believe this is just what they did. In summary I believe that the press did a disservice to BOTH the Queen and Annie Leibovitz and fabricated this uproar to sell newspapers. And it did. The video shows another story...it shows a photographer deferring to the Queen while directing the shot and the Queen helping her in all ways. See the video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..I suppose we have all seen the released video of that now &#8220;infamous&#8221; photo shoot. It appeared to me that the Queen was only trying to say that the crown took a fair bit of work to put on her head (and get the hair just right) and that they should take the &#8220;crown&#8221; photos first and then the &#8220;crown off&#8221; photos afterwards. And I believe this is just what they did. In summary I believe that the press did a disservice to BOTH the Queen and Annie Leibovitz and fabricated this uproar to sell newspapers. And it did. The video shows another story&#8230;it shows a photographer deferring to the Queen while directing the shot and the Queen helping her in all ways. See the video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
